Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Potential Passing of Prince Street Pizzaria - Reminiscence

     I got an email from my old guidance counselor from Rhodes Prep with whom I have been in contact for some time. He always has interesting stuff to share. This one triggered memories. I'll quote a bit of it, and for the rest, there is a link to the NY Times article:

It did not call itself the flagship Ray’s Pizza because it never really had a fleet. It was not Original Ray’s or Famous Ray’s or Original Famous Ray’s or Real Ray’s or Ray’s on Ice or any of the other cloned shops sprinkled like shredded mozzarella all over town. It was simply Ray’s Pizza, and in the great pizza wars of New York City, it was respected as having been the first, standing more or less above the fray at 27 Prince Street in Little Italy, with tree limbs holding up the basement ceiling and an owner whose name wasn’t even Ray. 

And now, it seems, barring any surprises, Ray’s Pizza — the original that was so original it did not have the word “original” in its name — appears doomed to close at the end of the month. 

This is not a popular topic at Ray’s right now. 

“I don’t want you to put that this is the end,” said Helen Mistretta, the manager who, seven months before her 80th birthday, is in no mood for weepy nostalgia. “It’s the end of 27 Prince, not the end of Ray’s of Prince Street.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/18/nyregion/rays-pizza-the-first-of-many-counts-down-to-last-slice.html?_r=1&emc=eta1

      My first pizza experience was a hole-in-the-wall pizza joint in my old neighborhood of Jackson Heights, Queens in NYC. It was on 77th Street, just up from 37th Avenue, on the east side of the street. I don't know if it had an official name, but we all called it "Ritchie's Place" because the owner and pizza maker was named Ritchie. He was a Jewish guy from the Bronx, in his mid twenties or early thirties. He wanted a small business and this one was available. Ritchie was open from lunch time until early evening and later in the summer. In his white t-shirt and baker's pants, with a dusting of flour he certainly looked the part.

     For a quarter, you could have a slice of cheese pizza and a small Coke, a good deal for the kids at P.S. 69, half a block away on the south side of 37th Avenue. I worked with Ritchie for a bit, learning how to make pizza. I was just entering junior high, so I couldn't have been more than 13. The pizza dough was made in a bakery in Brooklyn, as I recall and was delivered daily as rounds wrapped in plastic film. Ritchie used a big grinder -- what's called a "Buffalo Chopper" I came to learn -- to make the shredded mozzarella and the sauce came out of a large #10 can from Italy. To my taste, with no frame of reference, it tasted perfectly fine. On a whole pie, Ritchie could add ingredients, like pepperoni or sausage. At some point, he added heroes to the menu, with the meatballs and sausage sourced from a supplier in Little Italy. I developed a taste for sausage heroes there that remains to this day.

     When I started hanging out in the Village a few years later -- call it '62 or '63 until I got drafted in -65 --  I tried a number of places, but my favorite -- and I liked their Sicilian slices the best -- was on the NE corner of Bleecker Street at Thompson. It was pretty large and had tables, but I can't remember ever eating at one. We usually got a slice and a Coke and either ate at the counter, standing, or took the slice and soda and walked. (Checking Google Earth, it is now a place called "The Red Lion" which offers live music and such. Times change.)

     We walked a lot, back then. When Cathy and I -- she was the love of my life at that time, winter of '63 through the following summer --  lived on E6th and Ave. D, we would walk to the Village Where we lived was still considered the Lower East Side; the real estate people hadn't gotten around to renamed it the "East Village" yet. (It wasn't far, in fact, from the infamous "Alphabet City" which had, especially in the crack era of the mid-'80s, a truly horrific reputation. Even when I lived there, my aunt, who edited The Villager, the neighborhood alternative to The Village Voice and far more of a typical small town paper, was appalled that I was living, with my girlfriend, in such a dangerous neighborhood. We never saw it that way. It was, for a time, home.)  

     We called our journey "Westering" since that is generally the direction we were going. We'd usually cut over to 3rd or 4th Street to make the journey, since 6th didn't go through, ending at the Bowery or 3rd Ave. whichever you called it. I think on maps it was 3rd Ave. at that point, but we tended to think of it as the Bowery until the Astor Place/St. Mark's Place junction.

     Our destination was one or another of the coffeehouses we frequented or where we knew a friend was playing a gig. Our "official" gathering place was the back room of what was then Café Rienzi. At other times it had been The Commons and The Fat Black Pussycat and it would become Café Feenjon in the early '70s. (I was night manager, working from 7 until sun-up. At the time, I lived across the street at 107 MacDougal, above the Gaslight and the Kettle of Fish. No long walks, then.)

     At Rienzi's, we often had the large round table and the entire back room to ourselves, as long as we kept it clean and didn't pull the waitress back there when it was busy. We were regulars and comfortable enough there to get our own drinks and food from the counter and bus our own mess. If we wandered over on weekend afternoons, we often sat in the front room, often at window-seat tables as a draw for the tourist trade. One of our number came up with the idea, based on that, of renting us out to would-be hipsters for their parties, often at addresses well out of the Village. It as said of some of us that we would get nosebleeds above 14th Street, but we got over them. We were getting about 20 bucks for an evening as local color at a party. We pretty much considered ourselves Bohemians or, as some of us said, "Baby Beatniks" since were a decade or two younger than the real beats like Kerouac, Ginsberg and that crew. Back then, "Hippie" was an insult. Some of us still think it is, but that's a topic for a whole other posting.

     Now, after that meander down memory lane, or as Dylan called it, "my back pages," let us return to pizza. I contend that there is no decent "New York-style" pizza outside NYC, and that is because pizza is just flour -- which is pretty much the same anywhere, made from heartland wheat -- water, olive oil, salt, packaged yeast and whatever airborne yeast (what the French call le sauvage, wild yeast) gets into it. The only stuff that is specific to a place is the water and the wild yeast. At one time, a pizza maker in Berkeley actually trucked in NYC tap water to make a "true" New York pizza, but the cost versus price was just too lopsided and they stopped. I like pizza from elsewhere -- the California Pizza Kitchen pizzas are good, and I've had other pizza that was fine -- but it ain't real NY pizza if is isn't made in NYC!

     I mourn the passing of Ray's of Prince Street, even if I can't remember ever eating there. It is part of the history of Little Italy, a place that is being subsumed by Chinatown and the real estate market below Houston Street. The same thing is happening in San Francisco. Only a few of the old places still exist in what was once a thriving and vital Italian neighborhood. You hardly ever see an old noni with a basket for her marketing and the accents on the air are not Italian. 

     One of the last of the old places, DiMaggio's Steak House has closed. It used to be Fior d'Italia  and re-opened under the new name after a kitchen fire in 2005.  Fior d'Itlaia is the oldest Italian restaurant in SF -- they say in the country, but I have my doubts --  and has been in six locations since opening in 1886. It is still open on Mason Street, in the historic San Remo hotel in North Beach, not far from Bay Street.  (As DiMaggio's, it was owned by a Lebanese businessman with a fairly fat wallet. So at the end, it wasn't really part of the old Italian tradition except in name and menu.)

Monday, September 19, 2011

Familiarity, Contempt and Its Fallout

     I got an email from Stephen P. Wenger, one of his daily "Deadly Use of Force" postings. One of the included entries was from his friend, John Farnum, who is, among other things, a defensive firearms instructor. Here is that exchange, with added comments from me:

     This is John Farnum's mention of an incident in West Virginia on 30 August:

1 Sept 11

Blame-shifting as "SOP:"

In West Virginia last Tuesday, three wounds were inflicted, on two deputies, by a single bullet.  The 45-caliber bullet (45ACP or 45GAP, unclear as to which), fired from a Glock (model unknown), produced a hand-wound on one deputy and an additional hand-wound on the second deputy, as well as a separate hip-wound.  Both deputies were hospitalized, but none of the wounds appear to be life-threatening.

The discharge was accidental and took place at the home of one of the deputies, as the pistol in question was being "worked on."  Both wounded deputies are also Department Armorers!

In a statement to the media, the Undersheriff said the department-owned pistol in question "malfunctioned," causing the accidental injuries.

Oh, please!

I strongly suspect the pistol did not "malfunction," but, in fact, functioned perfectly, just as it is designed to!  It was allowed to point in an unsafe direction as someone, or something, simultaneously applied pressure to the trigger.

[Sounds like a pretty good assesment of the situation to me. Wonder why it took two of them to work on the gun in the first place?]

The culprit here (as is nearly always the case) is likely careless gun-handling, not defectively-designed, nor "malfunctioning" guns.  Otherwise, one would wonder why all these police departments continue to knowingly buy "faulty" guns.

And, careless gun-handling will never be eliminated, nor even addressed effectively, when we, apparently as a matter of policy, continue to excuse/deny our own carelessness/negligence, invariably shifting blame, robotlike, in another direction.

How is it that we're supposed to solve a problem, when we're prohibited from even mentioning the problem?

Guns will be in our lives, continuously, forever!  We have to learn how to live with them.  The "always-unloaded/never-ready" philosophy has served us poorly, as its exponents routinely treat/handle guns like toys.  Accidents happen when "dangerous" guns get mixed in with "safe" ones, as they do, without fail... as we see!

We need to always think of our guns as what they are: deadly weapons, there to protect us, not just as instrumentalities of recreation, there merely to amuse and entertain, like a golf club or tennis racket.

In short, we need to get serious.  We need to always be taking [care] of business... or, get out of business!

John Farnum, DTI

     This story was reported in the local press in the Charleston Daily Mail http://www.dailymail.com/policebrfs/201108300516 and The Intelligencer/Wheeling News Register http://www.theintelligencer.net/page/content.detail/id/558604.html
With two deputies out for an unspecified time, that reduces the Sheriff's strength by about 8%

     And, this is my reply to Stephen:
Stephen,

     As the old saying goes, "familiarity breeds contempt." Cops, as a class, are no more gun-savvy than they are radio-savvy or car-savvy. For many of them, the gun is just another piece of insurance they carry against the time when it is needed and the less thought given to it, the better. We've all heard stories of older cops in low-crime beats with rounds firmly cemented in place in an ammo slide by verdigris. I've actually seen it. I've inspected guns that had obstructions in the barrel and quite a few guns, especially when we went to auto-loaders, that didn't have a round chambered, which was our standard mode of carry: a round chambered, gun in whatever safe mode was available. Since the issue semi-auto in our department was a Glock 22, that meant that the gun was ready to go with a trigger pull against the NY2 trigger. ( The N.Y.2 trigger spring is even harder than the N.Y.1 trigger spring. The user will obtain a continuous very hard revolver-like increase of the trigger pull weight from  7 lb. to  11 lb. It makes shooting the Glock similar in trigger feel to cycling a double-action revolver.)

     When I was an assistant instructor and a Field Training Officer, I noticed that most officers, including veteran ones, often had trouble qualifying without a bit of practice. In a potentially lethal confrontation, the bad guys don't give warm-ups. (And some officers could never qualify on the first go-'round. Since we followed the City model of "no officer left behind" those who couldn't qualify the first time got a second try. If they failed that, they were disarmed, but kept working. There was, theoretically a limit to the number of tries, but I don't know that, in my time, we ever got there. (The worst case was a female officer who had to go back 37 times. She got lucky on number 38 and barely qualified.) Some guys will not give a thought to the status of their weapon -- or radio or car -- unless they are given orders to do so and even then, they will often fudge it. I know of numerous instances where officers had gone into an area on a hot call without doing a radio check to make sure that, if they called for backup, the call would be heard.

     Towards the end of my career, I was at work one day, doing paperwork. I had forgotten that I needed to qualify that quarter until I got a radio call from the watch commander reminding me that it was the last day. I had been assigned to a satellite location and was remiss in keeping track of qualifying on the unit bulletin board. So, I told the people where I was assigned desk space and some duties that I'd be driving to the range, got into my car and went out. I was in plainclothes, carrying my Glock 21 in a pancake concealment holster under a sport coat. I'd done some practice like that, but not a lot. I know, bad on me.

     I signed up for a relay, drew my ammo and, when my time came, stepped up to the line. After we went to auto-loaders, practice and qualifying was done with duty ammo, so you always shot what was in the gun and your two magazines first, then reloaded one or all of the three mags if you needed more. As I recall, the total number of rounds was based on the magazine capacity, with no segment requiring more than the basic load. I had a load of 40 rounds --13+1 in the gun; 13 in each of two magazines. We had a chance to reload magazines from cover if needed. In the days when not all officers had yet been issued an auto-loader, the course was based on the standard multiple of six, 48 or 60.
This is not the target, but is for illustration; shot with a 681 S&W w/158gr RNL
46 out of 48 are in the blue; all shots count

     We were using those man-shaped cardboard targets with a blue "Coke bottle" running from the eyes to the groin. All hits on the target, anywhere on the target, were scored as hits and you needed a 75% score to pass. I didn't manage to put every round into the blue, but all of my hits were center mass, or within the head on the failure drills at 5 yds. It was not my best score, but it was a realistic one. All of my hits were on target; 98% of them were in areas that would incapacitate the opponent, almost all of those in the blue. I say this not to brag, but to describe what I believe is the minimum qualification for anyone carrying a gun for serious social encounters. (I no longer remember where I got that phrase, but I like it.)

     I've only had one Negligent Discharge, when an Olympic-grade air-pistol discharged before I had brought it up to sight level. I had only thought of touching the electronic trigger. That was enough to twitch my finger. I learned a valuable and inexpensive lesson. Of all the guns I've taken apart to work on in the military, law enforcement and on my own bench or that of my gunsmith friends, I've never worked on a loaded one unless the round was stuck in the gun, and then I was very, very careful of where the muzzle pointed. I work very hard not to let my familiarity breed contempt for what is a deadly tool.


Murcielaguita Negra con Alma Blanca

     Back what seems like a hundred years ago and was really closer to 25 or so, I sold cars for a living. I took the job for a couple of reasons. I needed the money and there weren't a lot of jobs out there for which I had the skill-set. And, they offered to put me through a fairly lengthy training course. I felt that if the car bizz turned sour, I could use the training, especially in how to close a deal, in a lot of different jobs.

     I would be working for a large, multi-line dealer in Berkeley. The training went fairly well and I sold a few cars. As I recall, I was in the middle of my class in sales when we graduated. I went, first, to our Nissan lot. We were working out of a trailer on the lot while the new facility was being built, adjacent to the service shop a block away. The "Big Plan" was to move all the brands under one roof, a converted steel factory and warehouse near the junction of the 13 and Interstate 80, for those of you who know Berkeley. But that was still a ways off.
 
     I didn't do too badly selling cars and, when a position as assistant manager opened up at the firm's Dodge-Chrysler-Plymouth-Peugeot-Isuzu dealership down the street, I moved my stuff down there. I did pretty well as an assistant manager and learned more about the business from a couple of savvy guys. I could close another salesman's deal far better than I could my own, because the part of the business I hate was the whole shuck-and-jive of back-and-forth over the price of the car. When the time came to sit down and "do the numbers" I'd gotten to know my buyers and the decent and compassionate person who lives inside me had trouble with slamming them into a deal that would be good for us and maybe not so good for them. But with the clients of other salesmen? Piece of cake.

     Jump ahead a few years. I wasn't selling cars anymore, but I still had the general business model and techniques pretty well in hand. The car I had bought from the dealer at cost when the demo program folded for lack of ready cash, had decided to give up the ghost. So, my lady and I went looking for a car. We needed a wagon or SUV and I was looking at something like a Ford Explorer. None of them could be had -- this was at the peak of their early popularity -- for the price we wanted to pay and the SF Credit Union would give us, so we kept looking. After checking out the Toyota Camry Wagon and deciding we might like one of those, we walked down the street to that dealer's Subaru showroom. I'd had a friend who had a Subaru and loved it. So, I found a wagon and we took a test drive. We weren't ready to commit, just yet, so we went home.

     As it turned out, my lady got a terrible headache, so I went back on my own. I told the manager that I'd worked for one of the bigger dealerships in town and we cut to the chase. He had a wagon, loaded, in white that was sitting on his showroom floor and costing him money. He said, "Take the car, show it to your lady and come back and we can work the final numbers. But, I know I can get you this car, out the door for what you want to pay." So, I took the car home and talked to my lady. The color didn't thrill her, but we decided to drive back to the dealership, headache and all, and see if we could close the deal. Long story shorter -- we got the car for $1,500 below invoice and paid less out the door -- tax, tags, dealer prep and all -- that we'd been expecting. They were what is called a "motivated seller" since after a certain point, a car that doesn't sell costs the dealer more then they can make in profit. They don't buy the cars. They're what is called "floored" which means that some bank actually owns the car and charges the dealer a percentage each month to keep it on his lot.

     That car, named Nanook ( an Inuit word for the master of white bears in the shamanic tradition)  Nanook is sure-footed on ice, being AWD and is white. That suggested the name and when we found a polar bear fetish at Palms Trading in Albuquerque, the name was permanent. It's first trip, while still redolent of new car smell, was out to New Mexico and the whole Four Corners deal, a real shake-down and a two-week tourist holiday. That trip was, to a large extent, what made me willing to move to Albuquerque twenty-some years later.

     When my lady and I split up, I kept Nanook since she didn't drive. It served me well and got us out here on the Great Move two years ago. But the winter of 2010 caused this polar bear a lot of grief. At 17, he didn't do all that well anymore and we knew it was only a matter of time. Our mechanic went over it and couldn't really find any single problem causing it to do poorly in the below-zero weather, but found a lot of things that were akin to the maladies of old age in a person. We found out that we were looking at around $7,000 to bring Nanook back to good health, $7,000 we didn't have. So, a search for a new -- or newer -- car ensued in a casual and leisurely way, mostly on the Internet.

     While Nanook was laid up at the mechanic's during the winter, we rented a KIA Soul. We weren't looking for anything special, just a cheap economy car. Ana likes high cars and has been wanting one since her mini-van got totaled a few years back. The Soul is higher than the usual sedan or wagon, being what they call a CUV, or "cross-over utility vehicle." It drove well, Ana liked the seat height -- and so did I; no falling into a low seat and having to lever myself out again -- and it got good mileage. So the Soul was on the "definite" list for when we actually went looking for our next car.

     Finally ready to actually look for a car, we went to the KIA dealer a couple of weeks ago and found a left-over 2010 that was close to our budget. Ana had talked to the credit union and had an idea what they'd finance. We couldn't make a deal. I asked the manager on duty to see the invoice, after telling him that I used to be in the business and that when I sold cars, the mark-up was something in the 14% ballpark and that had been the basis of my offer. He said, "Well, times have changed and KIA tries to keep their cars affordable, so there isn't a lot of mark-up." He was right; it was about 7%. We told the salesman we'd be in touch. He was a nice kid in his first week in the job -- so he said. Car salesmen are not, as a species, the most truthful people, which is another reason I got out of the industry.

     We drove up the street to the Hyundai dealer. There were a couple of Hyundai's we were interested in, but they had none used and the new ones were a bit over our budget. The salesman, a 17-year vet of the business, told us he did have a KIA Soul on his lot and we went and looked at it. We both drove it at his insistence and it was nice, just as we remembered from the rental. It was a 2010 with a bit more than 25K on the clock. We sat down and did numbers. He gave us a price, I countered, low balling an out-the-door price. We looked a ways apart, but the salesman turned us over to his "finance guy" whose card called him a "business manager." I had told the salesman that I knew the business and I repeated it to the next in line.

     After several hours of number crunching, the "business manager" got us down to a 100% loan deal, with a lot of extras thrown in, assured us he could get us "bought" by either our credit union or some one else and handed us the keys and a lot of paperwork. We were both a little reluctant, but the payments, even at 100%, were about what we'd talked about, as was the duration of the loan and even the interest. We both liked the car -- another white one, which was the only thing Ana didn't like about it -- and buoyed by the business managers absolute assurance that he could get the deal done, we drove home in what we hoped was our newer car.


     Time passed and we heard nothing from the dealership. And then, a week after we drove away, the bomb dropped. We could have the car with all the extras -- extras on which the dealership makes money, sometimes more than the profit on the actual car, something I knew, but chose not to think too much about -- but we needed to come up with $7,000 down. Ana was outraged and majorly disappointed. I was just angry. We'd both allowed ourselves to be manipulated into doing something we shouldn't have done. And we both knew better.

     We told the money guy to back all the "Extras" out of the deal and re-figure the numbers. He did and we still needed $3,500 down to make it work. That is exactly what the credit union had told us before we got pie-in-the-skyed by the "business manager." We found a way to come up with the down and still make the thing work. I gave them a number, out-the-door, which they came close to. We signed another set of papers and gave them a check for the down and Murcielaguita Negra con Alma Blanca was ours. And the credit union's, of course.

     My family has always named cars and other motorized devices, like lawn mowers. My aunt had a grey Plymouth Cranbrook called "Pigeon." Her lawnmower was called "Victor" for some reason that has gotten lost in the mists of time. My dark-blue '49 Mercury, very similar to the one in the James Dean movie Rebel Without Cause became known as "Rebel." So, when Ana put a small black bat fetish in the car, I looked up the proper Spanish for a little black bat with a white soul. After Googling translations, I found a Spanish translation forum and got the colloquial form: Murcielaguita Negra con Alma Blanca. I tend to call her Blanca but Ana has called her Murcie since the bat went on the dashboard. She's a "she" because Murcie is sort of a female-sounding name.

     And we've both learned a lesson or two. The first is not to take the car on the promises of the dealer's people. The second is not to buy from that dealership again. Not that any of the others are better. But these guys only get one bite at this apple.

 Murcielaguita Negra con Alma Blanca

 

Ain't Necessarilly So

 Folks,

     The material below came to my email inbox from a friend of long standing. I read it and then decided to do a little checking, because the conclusions at the end didn't seem quite right. A lot of people would consider this racist or at least racially insensitive. Those of us who have dealt with people like this might see it differently. One must also wonder, exactly in what business Flair was an entrepreneur? (I feel like I can call him that; it feels like I've known him, or someone very much like him,  at some time or place.) Could it have been in the recreational drug business? That is often the root cause of young men dying before their time of gunshot wounds. ( I learned later -- see below -- that Allen and another man, both suspects in earlier homicides, were shot in one of NOLA's housing projects, so it could have been drugs or pay-back)

      Speaking of his family, I would surmise that, since his father is listed as Burnell Thompson, while his last name is Allen, his mother's name, that he is perhaps illegitimate? As are his brothers, Mattnell, Burnell and Lester? At least his momma named the boy Burnell after his daddy. Or we can assume he is the father of at least some of them. I guess that as a middle-aged white fella, I shouldn't have negative opinions about the doings of an extended Black family in my former home of New Orleans, but since I assume that my tax dollars helped keep this loose-knit family together, perhaps I should be allowed to have an opinion. Enough is enough. This isn't what FDR intended when he began the welfare state in the '30s as a safety net. No one expected or intended that people would live, breed and raise generations in those nets. Nor should they.

      Further on this, lest anyone think it is something Snope's worthy, here is this, from the Times-Picayune newspaper obits: 


"001296    Allen - Larmondo 'Flair' Allen Died On February 8, 2004. Devoted Friend Of Kawanner, Kiyshell, Joann, And Jeanne. (I'm guessing that these might be his Babies' Mamas?)  
Son Of Burnell Thompson And Esther Allen. Step Son Of Bruce Gordy. Grandson Of Delores & J. C. Allen, And Anna Laura & Wil Thompson. Father Of Larmondo, Jr., Christian, Kwan, Deidra, Larmonshell, Larmonshea, Larmomdriel, Larmonja, Darriell And Koreyell. Brother Of Mattnell, Burnell A., Lester, Burnell T. Edgar, Danta, Reshe, Wil, Shannail, Lekiksha, Gwendolyn, Jessica, Katina, Brandy And The Late Jerry. Friend Of Brenda And Dianne. Brother-In-Law Warren Craig. God Son Of Agnes Randolph. (I count ten children to Larmondo's credit in this, BTW.)

Relatives And Friends Of The Family Are Invited To Attend Funeral Services At Majestic Mortuary, 1833
O.C. Haley On Saturday, February 14, 2004 At 11:00 Am. Visitation Will Begin At 9:00 Am. Interment
Providence. Majestic Mortuary In Charge. Times Picayune 02-14-2004"

     
And this, also from the Times-Picayune:
 
"New Orleans, La., — This evening, members of the New Orleans Police Department are investigating the murder of two men, ages 25 and 22-years of age. The 25-year-old local man has been identified as Larmondo Allen. The other victim was identified as 22-year-old Edward Taylor.  The offense occurred shortly before 11:00 p.m., at 2339 Martin Luther King Boulevard (Guste Public Housing Development).

According to investigators, COPS (Community Oriented Policing Services) officers were patrolling the development and heard several gunshots and later found the men in the development.  Taylor was observed lying in the courtyard, suffering apparent multiple gunshot wounds to the head and body.  Allen was seen lying, a short distance away from the first victim, on a concrete stairway and near the second floor balcony.  He suffered an apparent gunshot wound to the chest.  Both men were pronounced dead on the scene.

Both men were convicted felons, Taylor had a Second Degree Murder Warrant for his arrest in connection with the January 7, 2003 murder of 26-year-old Aaron Jones who was killed in the 1500 block of Bienville Street.  The NOPD aired his photograph on January 14, 2004 in connection with this case.

Allen also has previous arrests, and in May of 2003 he was arrested on two (2) counts of attempted murder and one count of First Degree Murder.  In December and October of 1999, he was arrested on two separate First Degree Murder cases."

      As for the appended comments about the welfare largesse, I really had to wonder, since as I recall, the payments per child are not anywhere near that large. I called a friend who works for the SF Department of Human Services and knows a lot about the system for some info. She didn't have the information at her fingertips -- a rare occurrence -- so she directed me to the internet. 


     A quick check of the Louisiana Department of Children and Family Services website discloses that the maximum grant under their Family Independence Temporary Assistance Program (FITAP) which "provides cash assistance to families with children when the financial resources of the family are insufficient to meet subsistence needs" is $512 for all 10 of his kids. Now, since I don't believe they were all living together, you would have to look at the chart at http://www.dss.state.la.us/index.cfm?md=pagebuilder&tmp=home&pid=139 to figure out how much money each kid's mom would get. 

     Add SNAP -- the new program that replaced food stamps -- and you can add $1500 a month, assuming all the kids were living with one mom, which I doubt. For more detail, see http://www.dss.state.la.us/index.cfm?md=pagebuilder&tmp=home&pid=93. Even adding in some monthly average for health care and we'd still be far, far short of the $1,500 per child mentioned.

      And, do note, that according to LADCFS, "The goal of FITAP is to decrease the long-term dependency on welfare assistance by promoting job preparation and work. Public assistance is no longer a lifetime benefit but an opportunity to become independent after a financial crisis." That would lead me to believe that the welfare people would be looking to transition the moms into a working situation as soon as possible. Now, that's theory and I don't know what practice is like in NOLA. I do know that it isn't always successful in my experience in California, but that's a story for another time.

      Give me a lead and I'll run with it. You know me. I still find the piece falls short of out-and-out racism, until you get to the erroneous statements at the end about the $162,000 that Allen would get. I don't know how much it costs to raise a kid in NOLA, but I doubt that the moms of Flair's ten kids are sitting pretty and living the life of luxury the author paints. Not at all. And if Larmondo never worked at a straight job -- and I doubt that he did -- I doubt that his kids, even if they are legitimate, can collect any social security survivor benefits.


      Here's the clip I got in that email:

SAD  NEWS  OUT  OF  NEW  ORLEANS
   
It seems that every couple of days   New Orleans loses one of its treasured ENTREPRENEURS.

Lets get the players straight before we go on with this.
LARMONDO "FLAIR" ALLEN
His Companion:     Kawanner Armstrong
His Sons:     Christian Allen, Kwan Allen, Larmondo Allen, Jr.,
His Daughters:   Deidra Allen, Larmenshell Allen, Lamonshea Allen, Larmomdriel Allen, Larmerja Allen,  Korevell Allen
  AT AGE 25  -  He had 9 Children
(Could Kawanner Armstrong Possibly Be The Mother Of All Of His Kids?)
    His Father:         Burnell Thompson
    His Mother:       Esther Allen
    His Stepfather :   Bruce Gordy
    His Brothers: Burnell Thompson,  Edgar Thompson
     Wil Willis
     Danta Edwards
     Reshe Edwards
     Mattnell Allen
     Burnell Allen
     Lester Allen
His Sisters:   Shannail Craig
    Lekiksha Thompson
    Gwendolyn Carter
    Jessica Willis
    Katina Gordy
  Grandparents:     Delors Allen
    J.C. Allen
       Anna Laura Thompson
  Will Thompson
So let’s see, now:   
  His FatherBurnell Thompson, fathered his brothers Burnell, Edgar and his sister Lekiksha.
  His Stepfather, Bruce Gordy, fathered his Sister Katina.
  His Mother, Esther Allen, must have been unwed when she gave birth to: Larmondo, Mattnell, Burnell and Lester.
  We don't know who fathered Wil Willis and Jessica Willis, or Dante and Reshe Edwards.
  Lets hope sisters Shannail Craig and Gwendolyn Carter are married.
GOT THE ABOVE ALL STRAIGHT?
********************
NOW, THE REST OF THE STORY
He's 25 and has 3 sons and 6 daughters  
NINE welfare recipients collecting $1500 each.....
That equals $13,500 a month !!!  Now add food stamps,
Free medical,  free school lunches,  on and on and on AND ON.
Do the math, that's $162,000 + a year.
Anyone out there, sittin' on their butt while reading
this e-mail, making that kind of money?

Now that, to me, is a real Entrepreneur.
(AND  BECAUSE OF THEIR FATHERS DEATH, ALL OF THE KIDS WILL PROBABLY COLLECT SOCIAL SECURITY UNTIL THEY ARE 18)

And people wonder what is wrong with our country.

Sunday, September 4, 2011

Listening to Sarah Palin with Open Ears

I went to a private prep school for my last two years and a summer of high school between 1962 and 1963. The school, Rhodes, sadly, for it was a great place for many of us, is gone from the stage, fading due to a loss of direction and lack of capital, sold and sold again and then just gone. 

 Rhodes is the brick-faced building, 9-11 W. 54th St. It is now a private bank.

I had a number of influential teachers and mentors there, but this isn't about them, but about one who after a number of decades, surfaced through an alumni Yahoo list. My guidance counselor, who I wasn't particularly close to during my time at Rhodes -- I gravitated toward one of his colleagues -- wrote me off -list and we began a correspondence that has lasted for several years. It survived my being booted off the alumni list for not toeing the party line set forth by the list's founder and his successor. It survived my being admitted back into the fold and then being tossed off again. 

Hardly a day goes by that there isn't some tid-bit of information in my inbox from him and, of late, they have become increasingly political in nature. My mentor is a liberal, a staunch supporter of Obama who believes, honestly, that Republicans hate Obama because he is Black. He often lumps me in with them despite my continued reminders that I am a libertarian -- but not a Libertarian Party member -- and that I dislike the President's policies a whole lot more than I dislike him as a person, Black, Half-Black or whatever.  He has a strong dislike and distrust for the Tea Party and their positions and felt, like I did, that Palin wasn't presidential material.

So, in this morning's inbox, I got this forwarded from my mentor and friend from the New York Times. He still lives there, a place I abandoned back in January of the Bicentennial Year.

U.S.   | September 03, 2011
The Caucus: Palin Rails Against 'Crony Capitalism' and 'Career Politicians'
By JEFF ZELENY
On Saturday, Sarah Palin did not say whether she would seek the Republican presidential nomination, but she made clear that she has no intentions of simply falling into line behind one of the party's leading candidates.
   
Copyright 2011  The New York Times Company

That prompted me to respond with this comment:

"Well, I didn't think I would be saying this, but Ms. Palin seems to be speaking truth to power here and making sense. She also comes off in this appearance as someone who actually might have some presidential timber in her makeup after all. The political class is one of the biggest problems with this country and is something not envisioned by the founders. Of course, they also couldn't accurately foresee a nation spreading from sea to shining sea, nor the Internet, television, bloggers and the like either. The political landscape has significantly changed from what it was even when I first became aware of politics as a grade-school kid in Queens during the Eisenhower administration. Politicians still traveled by trains and the whistle-stop tour was not just a phrase without meaning in context.

"I don't know if removing all federal corporate taxes would sever the ties between big Business and Big Government. I suspect not. But unhitching the two Big Entities at the fundraising level, removing the motivation for Big Business to bribe candidates for office in Big Government and for the candidates to accept the bribes and do the bidding of their benefactors is long overdue.

"Whether or not Palin runs, she will impose a good deal of influence on the GOP to make some fundamental changes. And by being relatively even-handed in her criticism of the things that are wrong with both parties, will influence, I believe, some voters to make different choices."

I'm not impressed with the Tea Party, overall. I suspect them of being a manufactured and artificially supported group rather than a true grassroots movement. I also think that they are, for the most part, led by a group that fits the late Spiro Agnew's characterization of an entirely different group, but since the shoe seems to fit -- the Tea Party strikes me as nothing more than a collection of  "nattering nabobs of negativism." (Agnew said it; William Safire, for whom I have a great deal more respect, wrote it.)  They can tell you at each turn what Obama has done wrong. OK, fair enough; I can see his mistakes and the result of his policies as well as the next person and better, perhaps than some. But, what should be done to fix all of that? These folks seem not to have a clue. Nothing. Zip; zero, zilch; nada. And, I want more from a president and a congress.

These comments from Palin, brief as they were, at least shows me that she sees that the problems are bi-partisan -- if a little more evident in the present administration -- and that fixing them is necessary. She puts forth something like a plan -- doing away with federal corporate taxes -- which, as I said to my mentor, I don't think will work. But it shows she is thinking, at least. 

I will be paying attention to Sarah Palin. I have never been fond of a tease, and that is, for me, her least endearing characteristic. Will she or won't she? Is she in, or is she not? She is, for sure, a self-promoting and often rather grandiose populist whose rhetoric often isn't matched by her deeds. But that is true about nearly everyone who steps foot onto the political stage to some degree or another. I think it is certainly true of Obama. She has said some things along the way, including her remarks about 'Crony Capitalism' and 'Career Politicians' at Indianola that ring true. Now, if she can come up with some solutions, I'll listen even harder.

Saturday, September 3, 2011

A Good Idea? Perhaps. And a Brief Walk Down My Memory Lane

On my Facebook home page today was this from one of my friends who is a good deal to the left of my political position, but intelligent and thoughtful. Here is what she forwarded:

Obama Wants to End Tax Breaks for Companies that Move Jobs Overseas
www.politicsdaily.com
Business interests and even some Democrats worry about President Obama's insistence on ending tax credits and closing loopholes enjoyed by firms that create jobs overseas. They fear it could put the U.S. at a competitive disadvantage.

Emotionally, I am all for this. (And, note that this is nearly year-old news, dated October 2010) But I frankly don't know enough about business dynamics to say for sure that this is a good idea or that we should definitely do it. It seems like the right thing to do - reward companies that create jobs here, companies that employ Americans.

But, can we do that and remain competitive? America used to be a technology leader. In R&D we may still hold the edge. But most of the consumer technology, including the laptop I'm typing on, was made overseas and that is probably why I could afford to buy one each for Ana and me.

Products made by Americans -- especially ones in union jobs -- tend to be more expensive -- sometimes a lot more expensive -- than those made elsewhere. Some Americans have demonstrated a willingness to buy goods that are American made, paying more for them. But can American companies flourish selling only to a hard-core of American consumers? I just don't know.

I own a few replicas of 19th century Colt revolvers . They are made by Uberti, now a subsidiary of Beretta, in Italy. Retail they cost around $500 to $600. A currently-made Colt will set you back twice that, at least. And the other 1873 SAA clone, also made in the US by United States Firearms in the old Colt factory in Hartford, CT costs about the same. They are quality firearms, but at twice the price, are they twice as good? In my opinion, not really. 

For guns that will be used frequently and fairly hard, a Single Action Shooting Society shooter has to make a choice. Now to be fair, there is an American-made gun suitable for use in SASS that doesn't cost the earth. Rugers are competitive with the Italian clones, but their interior lockwork is more modern. They only make a limited range of styles, so if you want something a little different -- my taste runs to replicas of early cartridge conversions, for instance -- the Italians are the only game in town.

Cimarron Richard's-Mason Conversion 1851 Colt replica


Some of the off-shore-based car companies have done well and kept prices competitive by making the most popular models, the ones that sell best here, in American factories with mostly non-union American workers. They are willing to take a much smaller profit margin in order to do it, but it is being done. (I learned about the profit margin when I was recently looking for a new car. When I sold cars in 1985, the typical mark-up was 14% over invoice. I told that to the sales manager and he showed me the invoice. It was about half that. Times change.) Many of the parts of those cars are made overseas, but that is true even of American name-brand cars. The popular Dodge Hemi engine? Made in Canada. My Subaru Legacy, a 1993 model, was made in Japan, but other Legacys were and are made in Lafayette, Indiana.


As I recall, the first car that was sold in the US that had a truly international pedigree was the Ford Escort, produced from parts sourced from pretty much all of Ford's subsidiaries around the world and built in the US, Canada and Mexico from 1981 until 2003. During that period, lots of other Ford cars had parts from overseas, and I remember that the Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptor our department got in 1999 had lots of engine parts labeled "Hecho en Mexico."

So, it is possible to make a car in the US, sourcing parts from here and elsewhere and using American labor and sell them at a competitive price in the US. I don't honestly know if any of those cars are sold outside the US.

Can we make other things here and make them affordable? I really don't know. When I was a kid, radios, TVs, refrigerators, stoves and most other household electrical or electronic products were made in the good ol' US of A. At some point -- the '60s, as I recall -- that began to change. I had a small transistor radio that was a birthday present when I was 14 or so from my maternal grandmother. It was an Emerson and it was made here. Shortly after that, Sony hit the market and soon, it seemed as if they dominated the consumer electronics marketplace. After that, the deluge, as they say.

The first record player the family had was an old -- circa 1930s -- Fada Cathedral Radio that got regular AM and two other bands. Fadas were made in New York and my parents bought theirs in Miami after they got married in 1939. They used to listen to the Miami police radio channel in the evenings, so I was told. My dad and one of his radio-operator buddies had wired a phone jack and a switch so it could be used with a record changer -- a Webror, as I recall. It was beautiful and sounded great, with a 12" speaker beind the grill. It served for a number of years and at some point, Dad replaced the changer with one that would handle the new 45s and LPs.

Fada Cathedral Radio similar to ours

When the time came for me to have my own record player I went with a hand-me-down mono system from a family friend. It had hi-fi components that were, for the most part, made here in the middle '60s. In fact, when I first went stereo, my tube amplifier was made in my bedroom in Queens. It was a Knight Kit, sort of a lower-end version of the neater and more expensive Heathkits. All of my components in that system, except for the turntable, which was a British Garrard, were made in the USA. The components that replaced that system were Japanese -- Kenwood, Technics and Panasonic, as I remember -- with only the speakers -- newer Advent bookcase units to replace the older ones from the previous system -- made in America.

We didn't have a TV until after we moved to New York City and found an apartment in Queens. I had gone up the street to watch TV at a neighbor's house in New Orleans. It was probably 1952 or so when we got our first TV, a black and white unit with a 16" screen, made by Olympic in Long Island City, NY. As I recall, it was a table model, set on a stand with room underneath behind doors for storage. We never had a color set. When the Olympic died, Mom replaced it with a roll-around portable 17" Zenith, which, if I am right, was still made here.

 Ours was either a Governor or Senator, shown at the bottom

Back in those days, there were dozens of American radio and TV makers, some of them with names familiar to us, today. None, so far as I know, are still made here. I recently saw an ad for a Magnavox TV -- a familiar name -- made and marketed by Funai, a major Japanese consumer electronics company. Magnavox made products in the US as late as the 1980s, but Phillips bought them and now Funai controls the brand in North America.

I'm sure you can buy American-made consumer electronics, but from what I've seen, they are all high-end audiophile units, way out of my price range. So, would Americans pay more to have an American-made product that is essentially the equal of one from Asia? I'm really not sure. Let me know if you have an opinion. I'm interested to know.